Dulce Et Decorum Est Pro Patria Mori

Today marks the hundredth anniversary of the end of the First World War, on the eleventh hour of the eleventh day of the eleventh month of 1918. Begun four years earlier with patriotic zeal, it ended in bleak exhaustion, having turned Europe into a charnel house.

As Ezra Pound wrote in the aftermath,

They “walked eye-deep in hell
believing in old men’s lies, then unbelieving
came home, home to a lie,
home to many deceits…”

The conflict now stands as one of history’s great cautionary tales. Out of dynastic bickering, economic competition, hubris, vanity, miscalculation, cluelessness and pigheadedness came 20 million dead and 20 million more wounded, not to mention another 50 million dead due to the 1918 influenza pandemic that the conditions in the tenches and the movement of millions of troops helped spread.

People of my generation are just old enough to have known a few veterans of that war or people with a memory of it. My grandfather’s brother Leo died in France of disease, probably the flu. My wife had a relative who was a victim of mustard gas and had respiratory ills for the rest of his life. A friend of my grandmother’s served and gave me, forty years after the war, a set of unreadable books about the war in decorative bindings.

After the war, it was as if some giant hand had swept all the pieces from a chessboard. Nothing was ever the same again. Dynasty’s fell and empires vanished, in the Russian Revolution and the fragmenting of the Austro-Hungarian and Ottoman empires. The colonies of Europe began to resist their systematic subjugation.

A whole generation of young men were dead or maimed. Probably for the last time in history, the sons of the upper classes led the charge into battle and were wiped out. A British debutante who was sixteen at the start of the war said afterward that every boy she had ever danced with was dead a few years later.

Immense pressure from the working classes, who had been treated cavalierly as cannon fodder, was exerted to insist on a more equitable society. Yet instead of this popular anger and demand for change producing a more democratic and just society, the result was the rise of more virulent tyrannies — Communism, Fascism, Nazism — and soon the stage was set for an even worse bloodbath, beginning a scant twenty years later.

The Great War was innovative not just in the scale of its killing, but in its means. Death by high explosives lobbed from miles away, death in trenches by sniper and machine gun, death by tank warfare and from the air, chemical warfare. Industrial, mechanized, motorized war that enlisted entire economies and cared little for civilian carnage. About half of all the dead were non-combatants, ten million women, children, shopkeepers, farmers, innocent bystanders.

The fighting was also accompanied by, enabled by, elaborate state propaganda efforts to misrepresent one side’s success and the other side’s evil. At the beginning, Germans invading neutral Belgium were depicted as bayoneting babies. The war produced a legacy of blame, aided by this miasma of falsehood.

At the end, when the German military saw the war was lost and signed the armistice, propagandists concocted the myth that the victorious, undefeated troops were stabbed in the back by weak-willed civilians, which Hitler weaponized by scapegoating greedy traitorous, Jewish bankers. In Russia, the villains were the Romanovs, the ruling class and the capitalists. In Britain, the first Labour government came to power in the 1920s.

We still live with the fallout geopolitically, but also in these techniques of propaganda and fear mongering to gain power, to keep it, and to illegitimate one’s opponents. We still see the careless use of military power, the playing of zero sum games, the lack of foresight that supposes saber rattling can be employed without risking death and destruction, or that escalating carnage through the use of military superiority has no downside and can solve all problems. Yet Korea, Vietnam and our most recent quagmire (now longer than four World Wars combined) say otherwise.

Luckily, nuclear weapons have only been used twice, but if World War I teaches anything, it is that arrogance and folly are likely to trump caution and rationality at any time, with consequences too horrible to contemplate and impossible to undo.

Analysts suggest that one Hiroshima—size atom bomb delivered on Mumbai would kill 870,000 people in the first weeks. A full thermonuclear exchange between Russia and the United States could kill 100 million in minutes, the equivalent of ten simultaneous World Wars, and poison the planet irredeemably.

Do we believe Putin, Trump, Xi, Kim, Netanyahu and whoever in Pakistan has his finger on the trigger today are more trustworthy than the Kaiser, the Czar, and the rest of the crowned heads of 1914? They played with fire and it destroyed their society. Something far worse is only a temper tantrum and a push button away today.

Visit any small town in England, France or Germany and the World War I monuments on the town square list the names of the locals who marched away and never came back, column after column of the fallen. After a nuclear war, the ground would be too toxic for monuments. None large enough to contain so many names could be constructed, and the survivors would envy the dead.

In the past one hundred bloody years have we learned enough to avoid repeating the mistakes of 1914? I doubt if Wilfred Owen, who died in France at 25 during one of the last actions of the war, a week before the Armistice, would think so. Here is one of his snapshots from the war to end all wars, courtesy of the Poetry Foundation.

Dulce et Decorum Est

Bent double, like old beggars under sacks,
Knock-kneed, coughing like hags, we cursed through sludge,
Till on the haunting flares we turned our backs,
And towards our distant rest began to trudge.
Men marched asleep. Many had lost their boots,
But limped on, blood-shod. All went lame; all blind;
Drunk with fatigue; deaf even to the hoots
Of gas-shells dropping softly behind.

Gas! GAS! Quick, boys!—An ecstasy of fumbling
Fitting the clumsy helmets just in time,
But someone still was yelling out and stumbling
And flound’ring like a man in fire or lime.—
Dim through the misty panes and thick green light,
As under a green sea, I saw him drowning.

In all my dreams before my helpless sight,
He plunges at me, guttering, choking, drowning.

If in some smothering dreams, you too could pace
Behind the wagon that we flung him in,
And watch the white eyes writhing in his face,
His hanging face, like a devil’s sick of sin;
If you could hear, at every jolt, the blood
Come gargling from the froth-corrupted lungs,
Obscene as cancer, bitter as the cud
Of vile, incurable sores on innocent tongues,—
My friend, you would not tell with such high zest
To children ardent for some desperate glory,
The old Lie: Dulce et decorum est
Pro patria mori.

Notes:
Latin phrase is from the Roman poet Horace: “It is sweet and fitting to die for one’s country.”

The Beat Goes On

As of this writing, the Democrats have gained 30 seats in the House, lost a couple in the Senate and await slow counts, recounts and closure on several more. Yet the President remains a reliable source of business as usual in an otherwise changing world.

He appeared to take questions from the press and promptly berated them, called one racist and took away the press credentials of another. He also announced that the Republican loss was a win for him, and had John Kelly fire Jeff Sessions who had failed to prevent the Russia inquiry.

To replace Sessions, Trump will appoint as Acting Attorney General, Matt Whitaker. But there are a few little problems with that plan. First, Whitaker is clearly unqualified for the job. Though he was briefly a U.S.Attorney in Iowa, most of his career has been spent as an unsuccessful candidate for Senate, with a Republican propaganda mill, and as a thuggish board member and attorney for a company that promised to help inventors to make their ideas profitable, The FTC found it to be as big a con as Trump University and lawsuits were settled with aggrieved customers that Whitaker had earlier threatened.

Clearly, he is Trump’s kind of guy, but he became the Chief of Staff for Sessions by an even more endearing series of TV appearances and op-eds in which he argued the Mueller investigation was going too far and should be shut down. That presumably is why he is being offered a new job. How could Trump not like him? Maybe he has finally found another Roy Cohn

However, he may not get what he wants, as he ought to know since he illegally uses the Rolling Stones “You Can’t Always Get What You Want” to warn campaign crowds not to trust him. Legal experts, including a former acting Solicitor General, Neal Katyal, and George Conway, Kellyanne’s dissenting husband, say Whitaker’s appointment would be unconstitutional.

Article II, Section 2, Clause 2, the so-called appointment clause, requires that all principal officers of the government, that is those who report directly to the president, must be approved by the Senate. That includes an Attorney General, acting or not.

Given Whitaker’s conflicts of interest, obvious bias in the case of the Mueller probe, and dubious qualifications, he might find even the most slavish Senate unwilling to approve him. Two Republican Senators are already on record saying nothing must be done to interfere with Mueller — Mitt Romney and Lamar Alexander. And no less a conservative light than Justice Clarence Thomas has strongly supported the inviolability of the Appointments Clause in a recent Supreme Court decision.

And even if Whitaker could gain Senate approval to act as Attorney General, he would have to recuse himself regarding the Special Counsel, just as Sessions did, due to his on the record remarks indicating bias and his close relationship with fellow Iowan Sam Clovis who is entangled with Trump and George Papadopoulus and has testified before the Mueller grand jury.

Instead of solving Trump’s Mueller problem, his hasty firing of Sessions and ill-considered choice for replacement may simply add to the obstruction of justice case many believe Mueller is preparing.

Some have suggested Trump acted in haste because he thinks Don Jr. may soon be indicted by Mueller. Junior is quoted by friends as thinking the axe is about to fall. Presumably because of his part in the notorious meeting with the Russians over “dirt” on Hillary. If Don Jr. is indicted, can Jared Kushner be far behind. And can the president be sure they would take a bullet for him?

Failing a quick fix to the Mueller threat, can some more of Trump’s dubious pardons be ruled out? No, though state prosecutions for which his pardon power doesn’t apply might also threaten his family. And the biggest irony of his ridding himself of Sessions without considering the consequences is the fact that he may cause Mueller to act before he can be stopped, thus accelerating the day of reckoning rather than forestalling it.

Finally, though Trump only gets his news from Fox, there is this cautionary tale from an inside page of the “Washington Post.” The fate of former Texas Republican congressman Steve Stockman may suggest what lies ahead for Trump and friends.

Stockman has been convicted of 23 counts of mail and wire fraud, money laundering and other abuses for taking “charitable” money from several mega-donors on the understanding it would be used for voter education and other conservative good works. Instead, Stockman used it for personal and campaign expenses. He faces a $1 million fine and ten years in federal prison.

The investigations into the crimes of the Trump Foundation and Trump businesses underway in New York, and all those likely to come out of the Mueller probe and from under the rocks the Democrats can now turn over with subpoena power, including tax evasion, could mean Stockman will be getting some new cellmates from 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue by and by.

All that, and it is only three days since the midterms.

Election Day Blues

Two years ago, half the country was shocked that Hillary Clinton lost the presidency and an even higher percentage, including Donald Trump, was stunned that Donald Trump won. He became the fifth candidate in history to lose the popular vote while winning the electoral college, joining John Quincy Adams, Rutherford B. Hayes, Benjamin Harrison and George W. Bush.

Only one of them, Bush, managed to win re-election, perhaps because a president who fails to win a popular majority always carries an odor of dubious legitimacy. Trump seemed to many in 2016 unfit for office and had an approval rating the day he was sworn in of 45.5%. Two years later, he has still rarely bested that level.

Many regard today’s vote as an unofficial referendum on Trump, or at least a chance to provide some check on a gimcrack administration allergic to careful planning and addicted to improvisation, staffed with sycophants and cronies and enabled by a craven Congress.

Still, a solid 40 percent or so of the electorate hasn’t yet seen through Trump, or is willing to hold its nose to get benefits that they think cover his multitude of sins — tax cuts, a reactionary Supreme Court, a populist willingness to restrict immigration and keep Hispanics, African-Americans, Muslims, liberals, women, the news media, educated, science-based elites in their place.

Will enough of those who oppose Trump turn out to provide a check on a lawless and retrograde executive by winning either one or both houses of Congress? That is the question today’s events will answer. This assumes the vote will be legitimate, of course.

News reports suggest both Russia and Iran may be actively attempting to influence the outcome by nefarious, cyber means. Racist robocalls have polluted the races in Florida and Georgia. The president has appended his name to a shameful Willie Horton-redux ad, implying a cop killer Latino on death row is no different from any immigrant and that Democrats welcome such creatures to America, though in fact his poster boy villain arrived during the Bush era.

Voter suppression is alive and well, legislated in two dozen states controlled by Republican majorities, including Georgia, Nevada, Indiana, Ohio, Wisconsin, North Dakota, Texas, North Carolina, and Kansas. And who knows how many Americans no longer believe, as a result of the last two years, that democracy works, their vote counts, the playing field is level, not rigged by a corrupt system. They may feel voting is a waste of time.

They aren’t wrong to be short on idealism with a glaring example of self-serving contempt for our form of government and its constitutional protections occupying the Oval Office. Consider Trump’s recent claim that he can nullify, by a simple executive order, the 14th Amendment’s granting of birthright citizenship.

Legal scholars, including Ted Cruz before he went over to the Trump side, say such executive action in unconstitutional. The real amendment process is clearly outlined in Article V, but that won’t stop Trump from promising his base to eliminate pesky provisions like birthright citizenship, freedom of the press, of religion for Muslims, of speech for his critics.

A recent “New Yorker” article, “The Memory House,” discusses a form of palliative care for dementia patients. It’s called validation therapy. Instead of correcting the erroneous views of sufferers, which agitates them, caregivers “enter into the emotional world of the person with dementia and validate their feelings, because feelings [are] more important than facts.”

It appears that Trump is treating his base voters, and Republicans in Congress are treating Trump, as if they are demented. Rather than object to obvious falsehoods or correct errors of fact, we now live in a realm where, if the Queen of Hearts says so, black is white, up is down, climate is not changing, caravans of invaders are storming our southern border, and presidents can rewrite the Constitution on a whim. Better to agree than to agitate the deluded.

Some Pollyanna’s urge us to remember that we got this far in America despite apparently insurmountable odds at the time of the Revolution, a bloody Civil War, terrorist attacks, crippling economic busts, misguided foreign adventures.

Yes, but…

Inequality of income and opportunity may never have been greater. Minorities stiff face daunting discrimination. A changing economy has disrupted long settled ways of life. An international order that sustained our security and prosperity for decades is crumbling. Divided government has proven incapable to address these and other ills.

And most worrying, as the rise of Trumpism shows, many of our fellow citizens are unwilling or unable to distinguish truth from fiction, happy to choose anger, grievance, and Fox News and internet conspiracy theories over rational analysis and evidence. When the American reality is so painful to so many that they are willing to believe a pack of lies or embrace an alternative reality, the days of democracy may be numbered.

The Founders thought an educated, literate electorate, informed by a free press, was necessary for civic virtue to endure and prevail. We shall see when today’s ballots are counted whether the sun is rising or setting on our noble experiment in government of the people, by the people, and for the people. It commenced 230 years ago when the Constitution was ratified by enough states to become law. When it ends is up to us.